While I agree we should drop non-SSE (and have started a conversation to drop 
non-SSE2 as well :), the comparison to dropping 10.6-10.8 users is somewhat 
unfair.  Those users can upgrade 10.9 easier than the non-SSE users can buy a 
new computer.
—
- Milan



> On May 6, 2016, at 12:22 , Gregory Szorc <g...@mozilla.com> wrote:
> 
> On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 7:10 AM, Mike Hoye <mh...@mozilla.com 
> <mailto:mh...@mozilla.com>> wrote:
> 
>> On 2016-05-06 12:26 AM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
>> 
>>> FWIW, the crashes we've seen so far are from incorrectly emitted movss
>>> instructions. This instruction is part of the original SSE instruction
>>> set,
>>> which was initially unveiled by Intel on the Pentium 3 in 1999 and later
>>> by
>>> AMD on the Duron and Athlon XP in 2000-2001. I'm not sure why we still
>>> need
>>> Firefox to run on processors manufactured in the 90s.
>>> 
>> Per an IRC conversation with chutten, Firefox users on CPUs that do not
>> support SSE are 0.015% of our user base. (compared to 0.4% for no-SSE2). A
>> third of those are on otherwise-unsupported configurations (pre-SP3 XP,
>> etc), this work provides continuity of support to 0.01% of our users.
>> 
> 
> This population (0.015%) is ~100x smaller than the OS X 10.6-10.8 users we
> just decided to drop (going by bsmedberg's quote of 1.2% in the OS X
> deprecation thread). Looking at the numbers alone, I can't see how we
> wouldn't arrive at the conclusion to require SSE. Beyond the numbers, the
> modern web must be a horrible experience on ancient processors and machines
> not supporting SSE. I'm not sure what value continuing to provide Firefox
> updates to this population will add.
> 
> Reverting to VS2013 will have an unplanned negative impact on developers
> and automation. Reverting to VS2013 then deciding a short time after that
> we can use VS2015/SSE after all will have even more negative impact. It is
> desirable to avoid both these things. Therefore *I'm going to not move
> forward with reverting aurora and central to VS2013 unless someone says
> otherwise*. I have cancelled the aurora uplift requests in bug 1270664
> until a decision is made.
> _______________________________________________
> dev-platform mailing list
> dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org <mailto:dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org>
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform 
> <https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform>
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Reply via email to