I think we should strongly consider just requiring SSE at this point.

- Kyle

On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 7:10 AM, Mike Hoye <mh...@mozilla.com> wrote:

> On 2016-05-06 12:26 AM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
>
>> FWIW, the crashes we've seen so far are from incorrectly emitted movss
>> instructions. This instruction is part of the original SSE instruction
>> set,
>> which was initially unveiled by Intel on the Pentium 3 in 1999 and later
>> by
>> AMD on the Duron and Athlon XP in 2000-2001. I'm not sure why we still
>> need
>> Firefox to run on processors manufactured in the 90s.
>>
> Per an IRC conversation with chutten, Firefox users on CPUs that do not
> support SSE are 0.015% of our user base. (compared to 0.4% for no-SSE2). A
> third of those are on otherwise-unsupported configurations (pre-SP3 XP,
> etc), this work provides continuity of support to 0.01% of our users.
>
> - mhoye
>
>
> 09:59 <chutten> So, to put it clearly and precisely, of the Firefox
> Population in release and beta who are reporting at least base telemetry
> collection on machines running supported configurations, only 0.01% cannot
> definitively say they have SSE.
> 10:00 <chutten> (according to a 1% random sample as stored in the
> longitudinal dataset)
>
> _______________________________________________
> dev-platform mailing list
> dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
>
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Reply via email to