MattN mentioned there's also a "Tech Evangelism :: Addons" which is for bugs from add-ons where we aren't going to change anything in the product but we may contact the author or blog about the addon-compatablty change. I need to see how busy that one is (I would imagine that it it's being used for e10s related changes?)
-- Emma On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Andrew McKay <amc...@mozilla.com> wrote: > Looks like that would fall on me. After a quick look at some of the > bugs, its seems like its a holding pen for bugs that need to be passed > on to other areas or back to the add-on developer themselves (which > often means closing them). > > On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Emma Humphries <e...@mozilla.com> wrote: > > Pasting what I mentioned in #fx-team > > > > > > Regarding FFx::Extension Compatibility componen > > t. > > 702 bugs total, 282 of which are not marked against a particular version > > . There are > > 11 in FFx 44, 10 in FFx 45, 9 in FFx 46, 7 in FFx 47, 3 in FFx 48 > > , > > 1 tracking FFx 47 > > , > > and only 44 bugs since the first of the year > > > > I'd like to get those into the right component, and make a decision > > on disposing > > of > > the rest? > > > > -- > > Emma > > > > > > > > On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 1:37 PM, Emma Humphries <e...@mozilla.com> wrote: > >> > >> Let me take a look at those. > >> > >> On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 1:01 PM, Justin Dolske <dol...@mozilla.com> > wrote: > >>> > >>> Will Firefox :: Extension Compatibility also be rolled into this new :: > >>> Other component? > >>> > >>> (There are ~700 open bugs there still, most of which look pretty > stale.) > >>> > >>> Justin > >>> > >>> On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 11:53 AM, Benjamin Smedberg > >>> <benja...@smedbergs.us> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> There used to be a bugzilla.mozilla.org product called "Plugins". > This > >>>> product has been renamed "External Software Affecting Firefox" and its > >>>> component structure has been greatly simplified. > >>>> > >>>> It is usually not helpful to track defects in 3rd-party software in > the > >>>> Mozilla bug tracker. The only time we want to track those defects is > when we > >>>> want to make explicit outreach efforts because those defects affect > Firefox > >>>> users. > >>>> > >>>> There were previously almost a hundred different "components" for fine > >>>> classification of these bugs. This was not producing good results and > caused > >>>> confusion for many people filing bugs. So I've asked for most of these > >>>> components to be retired, and now there will be just three components: > >>>> > >>>> "Flash (Adobe)" - for bugs in Adobe Flash. I am triaging this list and > >>>> working with Adobe when necessary. > >>>> "OpenH264" - I believe Maire Reavy's team triages this component for > >>>> bugs that affect our deployment of OpenH264 with Cisco. > >>>> "Other" - For defects in basically all other 3rd-party software, > >>>> including other NPAPI and GMP plugins, Firefox extensions, and other > >>>> software such as antivirus tools, that may affect Firefox. I am > triaging > >>>> these bugs as necessary. > >>>> > >>>> --BDS > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> firefox-dev mailing list > >>>> firefox-...@mozilla.org > >>>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/firefox-dev > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> firefox-dev mailing list > >>> firefox-...@mozilla.org > >>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/firefox-dev > >>> > >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > firefox-dev mailing list > > firefox-...@mozilla.org > > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/firefox-dev > > > _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
