On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 at 9:01:45 AM UTC-4, kgu...@mozilla.com wrote: > On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 at 3:41:43 AM UTC-4, Kearwood "Kip" Gilbert wrote: > > Would anyone be opposed to combining the Matrix4x4 class and gfx3DMatrix? > > Rather than adding support for transforms and projections that involve > > vertices behind the w=0 plane to gfx3DMatrix, it may be cleaner to refactor > > affected call-sites to use Matrix4x4 instead. The remaining references to > > gfx3DMatrix would be very few and easily replaced as well. > > > > I think dzbarsky was in the process of converting gfx3DMatrix use to > Matrix4x4, I'm not sure what happened or if he's still working on it. I think > people would be quite happy if you finished it off. CC'ing dzbarsky to see if > he has any updates. > > kats
I ran out of time to finish this up and I'm not sure when I'll be able to get back to it. Anyone who wants to should feel free to take over. -dzbarsky _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
