On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 at 3:41:43 AM UTC-4, Kearwood "Kip" Gilbert wrote: > Would anyone be opposed to combining the Matrix4x4 class and gfx3DMatrix? > Rather than adding support for transforms and projections that involve > vertices behind the w=0 plane to gfx3DMatrix, it may be cleaner to refactor > affected call-sites to use Matrix4x4 instead. The remaining references to > gfx3DMatrix would be very few and easily replaced as well. >
I think dzbarsky was in the process of converting gfx3DMatrix use to Matrix4x4, I'm not sure what happened or if he's still working on it. I think people would be quite happy if you finished it off. CC'ing dzbarsky to see if he has any updates. kats _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
