On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 3:31 PM, Robin Berjon <ro...@w3.org> wrote: > Right. So I can't speak for the people who are working on that, but I can > vouch that they are open to feedback and have no foul intention whatsoever.
I've yet to receive replies to the feedback I gave when it was announced. > Overall, Anne's URL spec puts us all in a much better situation than we were > when we only had the RFCs. However, there are (likely mostly non-Web) > implementations and domains that are more strictly close the RFCs. If we > could keep those worlds separate, we'd all be fine, but of course these > things have a tendency to leak. As a result, some form of unified URL spec > that can work across the board makes sense to me (though it's not on my > personal high priority list). If there are people interested in the work and > it can be done through non-disruptive PRs I'm very much fine with it. It makes sense. However, so far we haven't even tested yet whether browsers can migrate from their current (somewhat broken) URL strategy to something that is slightly saner. Let alone whether they can migrate to something they never conformed with in the first place and which was written while simply ignoring important deployments. -- https://annevankesteren.nl/ _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
