On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 9:09 AM, L. David Baron <dba...@dbaron.org> wrote:
> The W3C is proposing a revised charter for:
>
>   Second Screen Presentation Working Group
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2014Jul/0001.html
>   http://www.w3.org/2014/secondscreen/charter-draft.html

(At this point a question rather than a charter comment:)

The charter says:
"Alternatively, if the second screen device understands some other
means of transmitting content to a display and a means of two-way
message passing, the web content can be rendered by the remote device.
In this scenario, a URL to the content to be displayed is sent to the
secondary display to be rendered there. Because the content is
rendered separately from the initiating user agent, pages hosted by
other user agents may be authorized to control the remotely rendered
content."

This case seems technically totally different for the first case
(having another screen to push pixels to). So different that I wonder
if the cases belong in the same spec. In any case, the above-quoted
use case seems to be the one DIAL was created to address. Yet, the
charter, while listing numerous liaisons and dependencies, is silent
about DIAL. Curiously, Wikipedia says DIAL was *formerly* used by
Chromecast (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DIscovery_And_Launch).
What's the relationship of the expected work of this new group to
DIAL? Has DIAL been abandoned? How is this work expected to improve on
DIAL?

-- 
Henri Sivonen
hsivo...@hsivonen.fi
https://hsivonen.fi/
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Reply via email to