2013/11/20 Ehsan Akhgari <ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com> > On 2013-11-20 5:27 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote: > >> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Zack Weinberg <za...@panix.com> wrote: >> >> On 2013-11-20 12:37 PM, Benoit Jacob wrote: >>> >>> Talking about ideas for further extending the impact of UNIFIED_SOURCES, >>>> it >>>> seems that the biggest limitation at the moment is that sources can't be >>>> unified between different moz.build's. Because of that, source >>>> directories >>>> that consist of many small sub-directories do not benefit much from >>>> UNIFIED_SOURCES at the moment. I would love to have the ability to >>>> declare >>>> in a moz.build that UNIFIED_SOURCES from here downwards, including >>>> subdirectories, are to be unified with each other. Does that sound >>>> reasonable? >>>> >>>> >>> ... Maybe this should be treated as an excuse to reduce directory >>> nesting? >>> >>> >> We don't need an excuse! >> >> layout/xul/base/src, and pretty much everything under content/, I'm >> looking >> at you. >> > > How do you propose that we know which directory contains the "source" then? >
And I always thought that all public: methods had to go in the public/ directory! Benoit > > </sarcasm> > > Ehsan > > > _______________________________________________ > dev-platform mailing list > dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform > _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
