On Wednesday 2013-09-04 14:28 +1000, Cameron McCormack wrote: > Bobby Holley wrote: > >+1. EIBTI. > > I agree, though MOZ_OVERRIDE does imply that the function is virtual > already, so it may not be so necessary there.
I also support repeating virtual as good documentation.
The introduction of MOZ_OVERRIDE (which is newer than most of our
existing code) perhaps offers a reason not to bother anymore,
though. But I think it's useful to have |virtual| be explicit.
> There are many cases of member function declarations like:
>
> /* virtual */ void theFunction();
I don't recall that convention for declarations, but what I do write
quite often is the same thing in function *definitions*, where
virtual (and static, for static methods) aren't allowed to be
repeated. In other words, I generally write:
class Foo {
virtual void do_something();
};
/* virtual */ void
Foo::do_something()
{
}
-David
--
𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂
𝄢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂
Before I built a wall I'd ask to know
What I was walling in or walling out,
And to whom I was like to give offense.
- Robert Frost, Mending Wall (1914)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
