On 7/3/13 8:49 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Benjamin Smedberg
<benja...@smedbergs.us> wrote:
Both resource: and chrome: have host names and need to support relative
URIs. Neither of them is a candidate for standardization, though. We should
just add them as special known schemes in our parser.

Well, either we have to standardize their parsing behavior, limit
their parsing behavior to chrome, or think of some third alternative.
We do not want

url = new URL(rel, base)

to differ across engines for any rel or base.



How many odd protocols and assumptions on how they work do we still have in mailnews' abuse of RDF? Not sure what's lurking in localstore.rdf and mimeTypes.rdf.

Also, sorry, can't offer more help than asking these days.

Axel

_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Reply via email to