On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 07:09:04AM -0400, Benjamin Smedberg wrote: > On 7/2/2013 6:55 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > >On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 12:51 AM, Mike Hommey <m...@glandium.org> wrote: > >>Note that some "custom" schemes may be relying on empty host names. In > >>Gecko, we have about:foo as well as resource:///foo. In both cases, foo > >>is the path part. > >about URLs don't have a host name. resource URLs might I suppose. Do > >resource URLs support relative URLs? > Both resource: and chrome: have host names and need to support > relative URIs. Neither of them is a candidate for standardization, > though. We should just add them as special known schemes in our > parser.
Note that host name is optional in resource: urls (for which no host name is the same as host == app), but not chrome:. There is no host on about: urls as well, as I mentioned, but about: urls never have a slash before the path. Mike _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
