2012/11/9 Robert Kaiser <ka...@kairo.at>: > Joe Drew schrieb: >> >> On 2012-11-06 8:31 AM, Henri Sivonen wrote: >>> >>> Therefore, I propose that we adopt the following policy: >>> 1) APIs that are not ready for use by Web developers shall not be >>> shipped on the release channel (unless preffed off). >>> 2) APIs that are shipped on the release channel shall be shipped >>> without a prefix. >> >> >> I am broadly in support of this, but I have a specific concern: Firefox >> OS will (or could) require experimental APIs that aren't fully baked >> simply because of time constraints. I don't think we should hamstring >> the features possible in FxOS to simply stabilize an API. >> >> I would, however, be in favour of the result of s/release >> channel/release channel on desktop/g. > > > I think we should have a pref that just turns on/off all the prefixed > technologies, and ship with that on in the experimental channels and off on > release
See my earlier email in this thread, we need the draft (hence, in current WG-approved practice, prefixed) WebGL extensions to support browser-based games. We don't want people to have to flip a preference before their browser becomes ready for games. Benoit > (I'd say that beta is up for discussion, I'd lean towards off on > beta as we treat beta as RC and want testing there to match release as much > as possible so we don't get surprises when shipping). > > This way, we can just ship B2G with that pref on as long as we require that > (I hope it will get stable enough at some point so we can apply the same > principles we're using elsewhere). > > Robert Kaiser > > _______________________________________________ > dev-platform mailing list > dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
