I disagree. "Pushed to inbound" is an important status to have
indicated in the bug, and the best way to do that is to include the
inbound changeset URL (even though it will be the same revision when
it gets to m-c, it's useful to know where it is until it gets there).
It also helps with backouts, and for later identifying the progression
of a patch.

Gavin

On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Nicholas Nethercote
<n.netherc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In https://wiki.mozilla.org/Tree_Rules/Inbound, one of the steps under
> "Please do the following after pushing to inbound" is:
>
> "Add the inbound changeset URL to the bug. If there are multiple
> patches on the bug and you are not pushing all of them, please
> indicate which one(s) you pushed (eg: use patch -> details -> comment
> on patch, or else use the new per-patch checkin+ flags)."
>
> I heard someone say today that this should be an optional step.  I
> think the rationale is that it's unnecessary because the subsequent
> mozilla-central links usually contain much the same information.  I am
> wondering if others agreed or disagreed with this opinion.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Nick
> _______________________________________________
> dev-platform mailing list
> dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Reply via email to