On 12-08-31 11:45 AM, Chris AtLee wrote:
On 31/08/12 11:32 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:> There are extremely
non-stable Talos tests, and relatively stable ones.
> Let's focus on the relatively stable ones. There are extremely hard
> to diagnose performance regressions, and extremely easy ones (i.e.,
> let's not wait on this lock, do this I/O, run this exponential
> algorithm, load tons of XUL/XBL when a window opens, etc.) We have many
> great tools for the job, so not all regressions need to be treated the
> same.
What value do the extremely non-stable Talos tests have? Shouldn't we
stop running them if they're not giving useful information?
Either that, or find some way of making them more stable, such as not
measuring the wall clock time.
Ehsan
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
