On 08/29/2012 09:54 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote: > On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Ehsan Akhgari <ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> I agree with that if we talk about performance in general. But this >> thread is about specific regressions in performance as a result of >> changeset going into our tree. I don't think the same argument applies >> here, unless we decide that we don't care about some of the things that we >> measure on Talos (in which case we should stop running those tests if we're >> not going to act on their results.) >> > > Yeah. Troubled as Talos is, we have had a lot of cases where Talos reported > a regression that we tracked down to a real bug in some checkin, and > backing out the checkin and fixing it was absolutely the right thing to do. > Talos is useful.
Agreed. Talos does find real regressions from individual developer commits. _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform