On 08/29/2012 09:54 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Ehsan Akhgari <ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com>wrote:
> 
>> I agree with that if we talk about performance in general.  But this
>> thread is about specific regressions in performance as a result of
>> changeset going into our tree.  I don't think the same argument applies
>> here, unless we decide that we don't care about some of the things that we
>> measure on Talos (in which case we should stop running those tests if we're
>> not going to act on their results.)
>>
> 
> Yeah. Troubled as Talos is, we have had a lot of cases where Talos reported
> a regression that we tracked down to a real bug in some checkin, and
> backing out the checkin and fixing it was absolutely the right thing to do.
> Talos is useful.

Agreed. Talos does find real regressions from individual developer commits.

_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Reply via email to