On 12-08-29 8:56 PM, Anthony Jones wrote:
On 30/08/12 12:10, Justin Lebar wrote:
More on topic: I think the essential problem is, you can spend a week
chasing down a perf regression when there's a good chance it's not
your fault (and also a good chance it's not a regression). So people
are making a reasonable trade-off here when they ignore these
problems.
It doesn't seem realistic to try to break down performance regressions
to individual commits or developers. Perhaps performance should be
reported weekly to teams so they can prioritise resources in terms of
who is working on performance.
I agree with that if we talk about performance in general. But this
thread is about specific regressions in performance as a result of
changeset going into our tree. I don't think the same argument applies
here, unless we decide that we don't care about some of the things that
we measure on Talos (in which case we should stop running those tests if
we're not going to act on their results.)
Ehsan
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
