Why abandon the classic symbol paradigm? I don’t think that the proposed symbols are recognizable in a glance anymore.
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 6:27 PM, Mirek M. <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi everyone, > I've put up a design process on the wiki page (@ > https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Design/Whiteboards/Flat_icon_set). > Please go take a look at it. > > I also submitted rough drafts for three icons: Paste, Cut, and Copy. > They're unlike all Cut and Copy icons I've seen so far -- instead of > showing scissors and stacks of papers, they use the same symbols as moving > an copying with files (an arrow and a plus icon). > > According to the drafted design process, the icons will be marked > "approved" if nobody answers to this e-mail within a week, so please > respond, comment, critique, iterate, so that we can begin to do this. > > Thanks. :) > > -- > Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] > Problems? > http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ > Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette > List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/ > All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted > -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
