I doubt it. I've responded (I believe) to all of them and the original reporters have not given feedback either way. I interpret that as
* Thanks, that works, or * I no longer care People can always open more tickets if they feel it's still an issue and we can dig further. On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 7:40 AM, John D. Ament <[email protected]>wrote: > Ok. How about the open catch issues? Do you feel any of those are needed > for 0.4? > > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Jason Porter <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > The last time I asked about it the responses seemed lukewarm, so I > figured > > it wasn't something people really cared about. We could certainly add it > in > > post 0.4 if there really is a desire for it. > > — > > Sent from Mailbox for iPhone > > > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 7:23 AM, John D. Ament <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Jason, > > > Does that mean we are no longer bringing XML config to DeltaSpike, even > > > though it was already voted in? > > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Jason Porter <[email protected] > > >wrote: > > >> Wrt xml-config, I'll be working on configuring cdi via osgi blueprint, > > >> over in the Aries project. If we want to port over the seam config > > stuff, > > >> we can certainly do that too. > > >> — > > >> Sent from Mailbox for iPhone > > >> > > >> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 4:42 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau < > > [email protected] > > >> > > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >> > @Gerhard: the point about proxy was i thought it was not straight > > forward > > >> > since some people will not want to bring any additional lib for it > > >> (because > > >> > they use only interfaces and proxy libs can conflcts). Wonder if > > handling > > >> > it with a dep optional couldn't do the trick too. > > >> > *Romain Manni-Bucau* > > >> > *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* > > >> > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< > > >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> > > >> > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* > > >> > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* > > >> > 2013/3/26 Gerhard Petracek <[email protected]> > > >> >> @ romain: > > >> >> imo it doesn't make sense to remove something (and add it later on > > >> again), > > >> >> if it's just a matter of few hours (to do it immediately). > > >> >> anybody is welcome to work on DS-333. > > >> >> > > >> >> @ DS-288 > > >> >> it's almost done and as i mentioned earlier i'll finish it once > > DS-289 > > >> is > > >> >> done. > > >> >> (yes we need it for 0.4) > > >> >> > > >> >> @ xml-config > > >> >> afair we had an agreement already, but nobody worked on it. > > >> >> > > >> >> regards, > > >> >> gerhard > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> 2013/3/26 John D. Ament <[email protected]> > > >> >> > > >> >> > I think leaving proxy support to full interface only for now > makes > > >> sense, > > >> >> > we can enrich this further in another release. How about we > close > > 113 > > >> >> as a > > >> >> > reduced scope and open a new issue for remaining items? I see > you > > >> >> already > > >> >> > did some Gerhard, but we still have abstract classes as a case as > > >> well. > > >> >> > > > >> >> > Gerhard, can you also comment on 288? Do we need this in 0.4 or > > can it > > >> >> > wait? > > >> >> > > > >> >> > Romain, I didn't quite get you. Are you saying you're on hold on > > this > > >> >> one > > >> >> > (dependent on something?). > > >> >> > > > >> >> > Does anyone believe we need Seam XML Config in 0.4? (DS-269 to > > 272). > > >> I'd > > >> >> > prefer to move it. > > >> >> > > > >> >> > For DS-105, it looks like consensus is to keep it since it's > needed > > >> for > > >> >> > older Weld versions. If so can we close as will not fix? > > >> >> > > > >> >> > Jason P - Can you look at DS-132/134? Do we need these? There > are > > >> other > > >> >> > catch like issues out there. Are they needed? > > >> >> > > > >> >> > Mark S - You have 12 issues assigned to you :/ > > >> >> > > > >> >> > BTW I created a new filter - only open issues [1] > > >> >> > > > >> >> > John > > >> >> > > > >> >> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12323789 > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau > > >> >> > <[email protected]>wrote: > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > Hi > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > DS-60: we are a bunch o wait after it > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > DS-113: think we can push partial bean to another release and > > keep > > >> >> > > interface handling for this iteration (well if you import asm > > part > > >> >> right > > >> >> > > now it can work but then the question will be which shade > > version? a > > >> >> > proxy > > >> >> > > as in cxf?....) > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > other are not blocker IMO > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > *Romain Manni-Bucau* > > >> >> > > *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* > > >> >> > > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< > > >> >> > > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> > > >> >> > > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* > > >> >> > > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > 2013/3/25 Gerhard Petracek <[email protected]> > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > hi john, > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > @ examples: > > >> >> > > > we haven't discussed what our goal is here > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > @ DS-60 > > >> >> > > > imo we should do it for 0.5 (and release 0.5 >short< after > 0.4) > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > @ DS-113 > > >> >> > > > we have to change the proxy-lib and move it to an own module > > >> >> > > > (i'll create the module today) > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > @ DS-263 > > >> >> > > > not needed, but nice to have -> +1 > > >> >> > > > (you can have a look at the setup we used in codi for it to > > know > > >> what > > >> >> > you > > >> >> > > > need) > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > @ DS-278 > > >> >> > > > i re-opened it because we should find a better approach imo. > > >> >> > > > however, it isn't a real blocker > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > regards, > > >> >> > > > gerhard > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > 2013/3/25 John D. Ament <[email protected]> > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > All, > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > Based on the flurry of threads, I wanted to help get things > > >> started > > >> >> > to > > >> >> > > > move > > >> >> > > > > towards a 0.4 release. I created the filter at [1] to show > > our > > >> >> > current > > >> >> > > > > progress. > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > We currently have 50 issues fixed in 0.4, with 27 > unresolved > > for > > >> >> the > > >> >> > > > > release. Some of these issues stick out, with me thinking > > that > > >> >> we've > > >> >> > > > > actually completed them but perhaps need some finalization > > >> (note: > > >> >> > I'll > > >> >> > > > use > > >> >> > > > > the abbreviation DS for the DELTASPIKE key in JIRA which is > > >> TL;DR) > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > DS-306 - I see examples. Do we need more? > > >> >> > > > > DS-60 - I believe we have started integrating CDI Query. > > Should > > >> >> this > > >> >> > > > have > > >> >> > > > > spawned child tasks? > > >> >> > > > > DS-113 - Gerhard took the reigns on this one and apparently > > it > > >> >> works > > >> >> > > just > > >> >> > > > > like the Seam3 version. Can this be closed? > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > Some low hanging fruit: > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > DS-263 - I was actually looking for something like this as > > well. > > >> >> > I've > > >> >> > > > been > > >> >> > > > > playing with JBoss modules a lot and think having a binary > > >> release > > >> >> > > would > > >> >> > > > > help add DS as a JBoss Module. If this isn't complete, do > we > > >> need > > >> >> it > > >> >> > > in > > >> >> > > > > 0.4? > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > DS-278 - If not done, seems easy enough to add. > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > DS-288 - Seems like another needed feature, but wasn't too > > >> >> difficult > > >> >> > in > > >> >> > > > > either CODI or Seam3. > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > DS-289 - Ironically, this one isn't even scheduled for 0.4 > > but > > >> is a > > >> >> > > > blocker > > >> >> > > > > for the release. I'll update it as such. > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > If you have something in the list below that shouldn't be > > (e.g. > > >> >> it's > > >> >> > > not > > >> >> > > > > needed for 0.4) we should get it rescheduled. Since > > previously > > >> >> only > > >> >> > > 289 > > >> >> > > > > was declared needed for 0.4 we should be looking at > > everything > > >> >> else. > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > John > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > [1]: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12323788 > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> > > > -- Jason Porter http://en.gravatar.com/lightguardjp
