Cdi query is one of the most expected feature. Saw on the list other people asking for it. Personally im waiting for it for some personal projects. Le 26 mars 2013 03:54, "John D. Ament" <[email protected]> a écrit :
> I think leaving proxy support to full interface only for now makes sense, > we can enrich this further in another release. How about we close 113 as a > reduced scope and open a new issue for remaining items? I see you already > did some Gerhard, but we still have abstract classes as a case as well. > > Gerhard, can you also comment on 288? Do we need this in 0.4 or can it > wait? > > Romain, I didn't quite get you. Are you saying you're on hold on this one > (dependent on something?). > > Does anyone believe we need Seam XML Config in 0.4? (DS-269 to 272). I'd > prefer to move it. > > For DS-105, it looks like consensus is to keep it since it's needed for > older Weld versions. If so can we close as will not fix? > > Jason P - Can you look at DS-132/134? Do we need these? There are other > catch like issues out there. Are they needed? > > Mark S - You have 12 issues assigned to you :/ > > BTW I created a new filter - only open issues [1] > > John > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12323789 > > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > Hi > > > > DS-60: we are a bunch o wait after it > > > > DS-113: think we can push partial bean to another release and keep > > interface handling for this iteration (well if you import asm part right > > now it can work but then the question will be which shade version? a > proxy > > as in cxf?....) > > > > other are not blocker IMO > > > > > > *Romain Manni-Bucau* > > *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* > > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< > > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> > > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* > > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* > > > > > > > > 2013/3/25 Gerhard Petracek <[email protected]> > > > > > hi john, > > > > > > @ examples: > > > we haven't discussed what our goal is here > > > > > > @ DS-60 > > > imo we should do it for 0.5 (and release 0.5 >short< after 0.4) > > > > > > @ DS-113 > > > we have to change the proxy-lib and move it to an own module > > > (i'll create the module today) > > > > > > @ DS-263 > > > not needed, but nice to have -> +1 > > > (you can have a look at the setup we used in codi for it to know what > you > > > need) > > > > > > @ DS-278 > > > i re-opened it because we should find a better approach imo. > > > however, it isn't a real blocker > > > > > > regards, > > > gerhard > > > > > > > > > > > > 2013/3/25 John D. Ament <[email protected]> > > > > > > > All, > > > > > > > > Based on the flurry of threads, I wanted to help get things started > to > > > move > > > > towards a 0.4 release. I created the filter at [1] to show our > current > > > > progress. > > > > > > > > We currently have 50 issues fixed in 0.4, with 27 unresolved for the > > > > release. Some of these issues stick out, with me thinking that we've > > > > actually completed them but perhaps need some finalization (note: > I'll > > > use > > > > the abbreviation DS for the DELTASPIKE key in JIRA which is TL;DR) > > > > > > > > DS-306 - I see examples. Do we need more? > > > > DS-60 - I believe we have started integrating CDI Query. Should this > > > have > > > > spawned child tasks? > > > > DS-113 - Gerhard took the reigns on this one and apparently it works > > just > > > > like the Seam3 version. Can this be closed? > > > > > > > > > > > > Some low hanging fruit: > > > > > > > > DS-263 - I was actually looking for something like this as well. > I've > > > been > > > > playing with JBoss modules a lot and think having a binary release > > would > > > > help add DS as a JBoss Module. If this isn't complete, do we need it > > in > > > > 0.4? > > > > > > > > DS-278 - If not done, seems easy enough to add. > > > > > > > > DS-288 - Seems like another needed feature, but wasn't too difficult > in > > > > either CODI or Seam3. > > > > > > > > DS-289 - Ironically, this one isn't even scheduled for 0.4 but is a > > > blocker > > > > for the release. I'll update it as such. > > > > > > > > If you have something in the list below that shouldn't be (e.g. it's > > not > > > > needed for 0.4) we should get it rescheduled. Since previously only > > 289 > > > > was declared needed for 0.4 we should be looking at everything else. > > > > > > > > John > > > > > > > > [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12323788 > > > > > > > > > >
