+1
2012/12/17 Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > back then while discussing this in BVal we also had the idea to just add a > module to commons-validator. This project already has tons of validations. > We might easily add bean-validation contraint annotations for those. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> > > To: [email protected] > > Cc: > > Sent: Monday, December 17, 2012 2:47 PM > > Subject: Re: DeltaSpike Roadmap > > > > +1 for a separated lib but not in DS IMO > > > > could be a commons-bval or something like that no? depend the amount > > of validations > > > > that's said bval-extra works too and i think i saw the same in > > hibernate (can't remember the name) > > > > maybe just another "merge" project to create, wdyt? > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > Twitter: @rmannibucau > > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ > > LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau > > Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau > > > > > > > > 2012/12/17 Gerhard Petracek <[email protected]>: > >> +0 (what we would really need with both bval and hibernate-validator > is a > >> constraint-lib which is packaged separately from the bv-impl.) > >> > >> @ thomas: > >> besides discussions on the list, you could follow [1]. > >> > >> regards, > >> gerhard > >> > >> [1] > >> > > > http://incubator.apache.org/deltaspike/suggested-git-workflows.html#discussion-workflow-optional > >> > >> > >> > >> 2012/12/17 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> > >> > >>> yep: here the extra part: > >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/bval/trunk/bval-extras/ (not specific > >>> IIRC) > >>> > >>> and here the email: > >>> > >>> > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/bval/trunk/bval-jsr303/src/main/java/org/apache/bval/constraints/EmailValidator.java > >>> > >>> Romain Manni-Bucau > >>> Twitter: @rmannibucau > >>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ > >>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau > >>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> 2012/12/17 John D. Ament <[email protected]>: > >>> > +1 to Romain's thoughts. > >>> > > >>> > DeltaSpike shouldn't care about Validations, since > >>> > javax.validator.Validator is already injectable to the application > > stack. > >>> > Hibernate Validator already provides an @Email as well, perhaps > > it would > >>> > be worthwhile to encourage that community publish the constraints > > in an > >>> > implementation inspecific fashion (right now I think they're > > just part of > >>> > the JAR). > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau > >>> > <[email protected]>wrote: > >>> > > >>> >> Hi, > >>> >> > >>> >> about bval we should maybe see with bval project. IMO we > > shouldnt take > >>> >> validator which doesn't need CDI (bval-extra is here for > > that) - i > >>> >> think to email one which is already in place in bval-extra > >>> >> > >>> >> wdyt? > >>> >> > >>> >> Romain Manni-Bucau > >>> >> Twitter: @rmannibucau > >>> >> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ > >>> >> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau > >>> >> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> 2012/12/17 Thomas Andraschko > > <[email protected]>: > >>> >> > ng i used in some project is > >>> >> > >>> > > > -- Jean-Louis
