+0 (what we would really need with both bval and hibernate-validator is a constraint-lib which is packaged separately from the bv-impl.)
@ thomas: besides discussions on the list, you could follow [1]. regards, gerhard [1] http://incubator.apache.org/deltaspike/suggested-git-workflows.html#discussion-workflow-optional 2012/12/17 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> > yep: here the extra part: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/bval/trunk/bval-extras/ (not specific > IIRC) > > and here the email: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/bval/trunk/bval-jsr303/src/main/java/org/apache/bval/constraints/EmailValidator.java > > Romain Manni-Bucau > Twitter: @rmannibucau > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ > LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau > Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau > > > > 2012/12/17 John D. Ament <[email protected]>: > > +1 to Romain's thoughts. > > > > DeltaSpike shouldn't care about Validations, since > > javax.validator.Validator is already injectable to the application stack. > > Hibernate Validator already provides an @Email as well, perhaps it would > > be worthwhile to encourage that community publish the constraints in an > > implementation inspecific fashion (right now I think they're just part of > > the JAR). > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> about bval we should maybe see with bval project. IMO we shouldnt take > >> validator which doesn't need CDI (bval-extra is here for that) - i > >> think to email one which is already in place in bval-extra > >> > >> wdyt? > >> > >> Romain Manni-Bucau > >> Twitter: @rmannibucau > >> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ > >> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau > >> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau > >> > >> > >> > >> 2012/12/17 Thomas Andraschko <[email protected]>: > >> > ng i used in some project is > >> >
