Do we want to do this with one big class with a bunch of subclasses in the same file, or one class per action that needs to happen? Also which string do we want to use for our actions? I haven't seen any sort of definitive list of "standard" action names, maybe I've just missed them.
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 3:47 AM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote: > Txs, I've now created a Jira task for it: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-193 > > > Who likes to do this? > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Pete Muir <[email protected]> > > To: [email protected]; Mark Struberg < > [email protected]> > > Cc: > > Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 11:38 AM > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] SecurityManager awareness yes/no? > > > > No, and there is no requirement being added to enable the SM out of the > box > > (thankfully!). > > > > On 12 Jun 2012, at 10:36, Mark Struberg wrote: > > > >> Yes, that's what I feared. Do JBossAS7.1 out of the box has the SM > > enabled? > >> > >> > >> If not we shall setup a CI job with such a situation. > >> > >> LieGrue, > >> strub > >> > >>> ________________________________ > >>> From: Pete Muir <[email protected]> > >>> To: [email protected]; Mark Struberg > > <[email protected]> > >>> Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 11:15 AM > >>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] SecurityManager awareness yes/no? > >>> > >>> Java EE 7 will mandate that a Java EE implementation must be able to > > run under a SM. It makes sense to test DS under a SM as well, IMO, as > some > > people want it… > >>> > >>> I think you can surround stuff in a "if SM enabled" block? > >>> > >>> On 11 Jun 2012, at 08:53, Mark Struberg wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi! > >>>> > >>>> Do we like to be fully SecurityManager aware? SecurityManagers are > > always a big performance hog, but when looking at all the (imo weird) EE7 > > 'cloud' proposals, I have the strong feeling that most functions will be > > based on excessive SecurityManager usage... > >>>> How can we test this best? > >>>> > >>>> LieGrue, > >>>> strub > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > > > -- Jason Porter http://lightguard-jp.blogspot.com http://twitter.com/lightguardjp Software Engineer Open Source Advocate Author of Seam Catch - Next Generation Java Exception Handling PGP key id: 926CCFF5 PGP key available at: keyserver.net, pgp.mit.edu
