No, and there is no requirement being added to enable the SM out of the box (thankfully!).
On 12 Jun 2012, at 10:36, Mark Struberg wrote: > Yes, that's what I feared. Do JBossAS7.1 out of the box has the SM enabled? > > > If not we shall setup a CI job with such a situation. > > LieGrue, > strub > >> ________________________________ >> From: Pete Muir <[email protected]> >> To: [email protected]; Mark Struberg <[email protected]> >> Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 11:15 AM >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] SecurityManager awareness yes/no? >> >> Java EE 7 will mandate that a Java EE implementation must be able to run >> under a SM. It makes sense to test DS under a SM as well, IMO, as some >> people want it… >> >> I think you can surround stuff in a "if SM enabled" block? >> >> On 11 Jun 2012, at 08:53, Mark Struberg wrote: >> >>> Hi! >>> >>> Do we like to be fully SecurityManager aware? SecurityManagers are always a >>> big performance hog, but when looking at all the (imo weird) EE7 'cloud' >>> proposals, I have the strong feeling that most functions will be based on >>> excessive SecurityManager usage... >>> How can we test this best? >>> >>> LieGrue, >>> strub >>> >> >> >> >>
