Hi Ben, On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 5:20 PM, Ben Elliston <b...@air.net.au> wrote: > On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 03:04:09PM -0700, Filipe Brandenburger wrote: >> So, I'm proposing adding a new option (--log_user is my suggestion, >> but feel free to pick something else) to allow enabling "log_user" >> expect output to stdout without the need to increase verbosity. > > I don't have a problem with the patch in priciple. I can see it would > be useful, and it's optional. However, calling the option 'log_user' > exposes details of Expect. I would rather not do that. Can you > rename the option to perhaps --log_dialog? Better to keep the > underscore for consistency with older, existing two-word options (eg, > --tool_opts).
Sure, that makes sense and --log_dialog looks more appropriate. > Can you please update the patch and send it again? Will do shortly. Cheers, Filipe _______________________________________________ DejaGnu mailing list DejaGnu@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dejagnu
