On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 03:04:09PM -0700, Filipe Brandenburger wrote: > So, I'm proposing adding a new option (--log_user is my suggestion, > but feel free to pick something else) to allow enabling "log_user" > expect output to stdout without the need to increase verbosity.
I don't have a problem with the patch in priciple. I can see it would be useful, and it's optional. However, calling the option 'log_user' exposes details of Expect. I would rather not do that. Can you rename the option to perhaps --log_dialog? Better to keep the underscore for consistency with older, existing two-word options (eg, --tool_opts). Can you please update the patch and send it again? Thanks, Ben
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ DejaGnu mailing list DejaGnu@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dejagnu
