On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 02:13:04PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 09:09:21AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > > In principle yes -- though the packages is quite simple (so it might be > > a bit overkill). I'll get back to you when I have comething concrete I > > think -- don't know yet and aren't in a rush. > > Well, I had a look at the BTS and netkit-ntalk has a 0-bug count. It's not > much work to maintain this package, but if you have some ideas or whatever > just drop me a note.
Ok. So, if I understand correctly, you uploaded and adopted that package without even looking at the buglist? Or am I missing something? Anyway, if you use it with talk, you'll notice some bugs... hostname resolving fails, supurious syslog messages at least in combination with ytalk, and refusal to work with usernames > 8 characters. Dunno why they were gone from the list, used to be there iirc... --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357) http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
