On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 02:28:32AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > > Eh? Did you check whether something happened to that bug first? I > guessed you didn't / missed it, since you didn't mail me.
Sorry, not my fault. I did check but at that time your mail wasn't archived yet and couldn't see it. The package is already adopted but don't worry, i'm fine with you participating in it. > Note also that Henning Makholm showed interest in some of these > netkit packages, so it'd be polite to inform him too. Note that he has a > valid point that standard packages should be co-maintained if possible. Indeed, he's on CC. Well, so are you interested in co-maintaining netkit-ntalk? I see that you're still in NM. This shouldn't be a problem as I can sponsor your work if you like. > Anyway, since it seems we both are interested, I've erased the owner for > now. What is your motivation to want to adopt this package? Any specific > reasons? (I'm just trying to see who would be the best one to adopt this > one, and you didn't supply any additional information). My motivation, as usual, is having fun while helping Debian (I hope you don't have any concerns with it =)). I'm also co-maintainer of inetutils, an experimental package with similar funcionality, so I think to be quite indicate for these packages in particular. -- Robert Millan "[..] but the delight and pride of Aule is in the deed of making, and in the thing made, and neither in possession nor in his own mastery; wherefore he gives and hoards not, and is free from care, passing ever on to some new work." -- J.R.R.T., Ainulindale (Silmarillion)
