On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 12:07:41AM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > (a couple of CCs dropped) > > Hi nyu, > > On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 11:11:41PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > > It wasn't my intention to hijack the ITP. My impression was that after five > > months from your last message there was no more activity, which turned out > > not to be the case. Sorry for the oversight. > > What oversight? I hope you mean the fact that you did not ask back > whether Raphael was still inclined to package attal; not that you > accidently didn't know about his activity.
Yes. > > > Since I'm also on the nm process, I put Michael and new-maintainer on > > > copy, since the work on attal was part of the process. > > > > There should have been a mail explaining that in the ITP log. > > Why? Because an ITP log which hasn't been updated for five months could lead people into thinking it is abandoned. -- Robert Millan "[..] but the delight and pride of Aule is in the deed of making, and in the thing made, and neither in possession nor in his own mastery; wherefore he gives and hoards not, and is free from care, passing ever on to some new work." -- J.R.R.T., Ainulindale (Silmarillion)
