On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 12:07:41AM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 11:11:41PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > > It wasn't my intention to hijack the ITP. My impression was that after five > > months from your last message there was no more activity, which turned out > > not to be the case. Sorry for the oversight. > > What oversight? I hope you mean the fact that you did not ask back > whether Raphael was still inclined to package attal; not that you > accidently didn't know about his activity. > > It is not required to use the ITP bug report as a blog for all the > different stuff you do for the package, but I really believe it is good > mannors to at least pretend to try to contact the (seemingly inactive) > ITPer.
Thoroughly agreed. Also, Robert, please use the 'owner' command to control@ rather than 'submitter' for saying that you're taking responsibility for a WNPP bug somebody else submitted, as mentioned at <http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp>. Cheers, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
