Your message dated Sat, 30 Mar 2002 13:12:33 +0000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing NMU-fixed wnpp bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Mar 2002 22:02:05 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 11 16:02:05 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from wireless-593-139.mobile.jhu.edu (thanatos.toad.net)
[128.220.80.68] (postfix)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16kXrp-0002v8-00; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 16:02:05 -0600
Received: by thanatos.toad.net (Postfix, from userid 500)
id AB5EB3EC24; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 17:03:15 -0500 (EST)
From: Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ITP: pm-common -- Package for power management utilities common to APM
and ACPI
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.99.1
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.99.1
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 17:03:14 -0500
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-03-11
Severity: wishlist
* Package name : pm-common
Version : 1.0 (Debian native)
* License : GPL
Description : Power management utilities common to APM and ACPI
The apmd packaging team wants to move the on_ac_power, apm_available
and acpi_available utilities into a package separate from apmd so
that users can test power status with either apmd or acpid installed.
If we don't put these utilities in a separate package then either we
eliminate them from /usr/bin (which was tried, and protested) or we
put different versions in apmd and acpid and make these conflict.
However making apmd and acpid conflict would be both inconvenient
and in violation of policy (since apmd is priority optional).
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux thanatos 2.4.19-pre2-ac4 #3 Sun Mar 10 14:41:16 EST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 137915-done) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Mar 2002 13:16:02 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 30 07:16:02 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gadolinium.btinternet.com [194.73.73.111]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16rIiA-0005JB-00; Sat, 30 Mar 2002 07:16:02 -0600
Received: from host217-35-31-177.in-addr.btopenworld.com ([217.35.31.177]
helo=arborlon.lab.dotat.at)
by gadolinium.btinternet.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #8)
id 16rIi8-0000y8-00; Sat, 30 Mar 2002 13:16:00 +0000
Received: from cjwatson by arborlon.lab.dotat.at with local (Exim 3.35 #1
(Debian))
id 16rIen-0006b2-00; Sat, 30 Mar 2002 13:12:33 +0000
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2002 13:12:33 +0000
From: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Closing NMU-fixed wnpp bugs
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Sender: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There's no real point in having bugs marked "fixed in NMU" against wnpp,
so I'm closing them now. (Actually, it looks like all of these bugs were
maintainer uploads that got treated as NMUs because a sponsor used the
-m flag to dpkg-buildpackage.)
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
