On 15/08/10 at 11:28 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 09:31:31PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > > Let's keep the APT2 name instead of the UPS name. The UPS name is a good > > joke, but it's not good for a real program name, because: > > > * UPS = Uninterruptible Power Supply > > * UPS = United Parcel Service > > * Ups = a debugger > > * It's a too common name > > > I think that all in all, apt2 is a known name already, it can be found > > easily, it can not be confused with other things. > > Is apt2 using the same resolver as apt, and are changes to that resolver > coordinated with the existing apt implementation? > > Does apt2 implement support for multiarch? > > > Well, you're the only one to complain about the naming. > > I also object to giving this package a name that implies it's the successor > implementation to the current apt when, today, it is not.
FWIW, I also object. The jabberd2/jabberd14 is a big mess, let's avoid repeating the same mistake with APT. Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100815185146.ga2...@xanadu.blop.info
