]] Julian Andres Klode Hi,
| I think that all in all, apt2 is a known name already, it can be found | easily, it can not be confused with other things. I find it fairly rude to stomp on apt's namespace like that, and while apt's currently at a sub-1 number, it might eventually reach 2.0, and then you'll have more confusion, just like you have for jabberd 1.4 and jabberd2 being completely different code bases that have nothing in common apart from the name. The same goes for apt-ng or similar names that imply that «apt2» is the next version of apt. (This said with the assumption that «apt2» isn't scheduled to replace apt, with the apt maintainers's blessing. If they're happy to drop the current apt in favour of «apt2», my complaint goes away.) Regards, -- Tollef Fog Heen UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87hbixbi4i....@qurzaw.linpro.no
