On Sat, May 01, 2004 at 08:38:28PM -0300, Derek Broughton wrote: > but why would you do that? Sarge has been a perfectly good system for two > years (iirc - it's too long ago for me to really remember when I upgraded) - > and keeping pretty current, too. So people who want extremely stable > servers are still using Woody, but most end-users who have a clue have > Sarge. It would be nice to see it go stable, but I can't see that I'm > getting very far behind the bleeding edge with Sarge (eg, KDE 3.2.2 came > into sarge last week - just a couple of months after it was released)
*I* use Sarge. But as Monique said, it's going to get *less* stable as the release date approaches. And it is IMPOSSIBLE to use Woody on a new server now, because it doesn't support current hardware. If you suggest using Sarge on a server, I point out that it doesn't get rapid security updates. -- Carl Fink [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jabootu's Minister of Proofreading http://www.jabootu.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
