On 2004-05-01, Derek Broughton penned: > > but why would you do that? Sarge has been a perfectly good system for > two years (iirc - it's too long ago for me to really remember when I > upgraded) - and keeping pretty current, too. So people who want > extremely stable servers are still using Woody, but most end-users who > have a clue have Sarge. It would be nice to see it go stable, but I > can't see that I'm getting very far behind the bleeding edge with > Sarge (eg, KDE 3.2.2 came into sarge last week - just a couple of > months after it was released)
Read through the threads from the last few weeks for discussions of why sarge is *not* the version for end-uses who have a clue. Summary: right now (ie, right before it's about to be released), testing is pretty usable, but it's intended more as a developer sandbox than as a useable system. For that reason, expect the new testing version to start breaking hard once sarge has been promoted to "stable" -- and expect those breakages to take months to sort out. -- monique -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
