Stefan Monnier (HE12026-07-08): > FWIW, I tried `nc` for that (because I like `nc` for actual transfers) > but didn't like it because it doesn't give enough feedback. I just > tried `socat` and it similarly just "sits there" sometimes, at which > point I have to use my head to try and guess if it means it successfully > connected but the other end doesn't send anything, or if it means it's > still waiting for the connection to be established, etc...
Could it be that `socat -dd` is more to your liking? Regards, -- Nicolas George
