On Sun, 9 Nov 2025, Nicolas George wrote: > [email protected] (HE12025-11-09): >> if i wanted to have the same results as my command above >> but wanted to do it so it didn't consume memory for storage >> and i didn't want to manage files >> what might a good alternate strategy be >> is there a replacement for mail that uses file storage > > Reality check: are you saying that you are concerned by the memory usage > of storing the output of your command but want to send it by mail?
yes > Are > there exceptional constraints that we do not know about? single board computers with limited memory
