[email protected] (HE12025-11-09):
> if i wanted to have the same results as my command above
> but wanted to do it so it didn't consume memory for storage
> and i didn't want to manage files
> what might a good alternate strategy be
> is there a replacement for mail that uses file storage

Reality check: are you saying that you are concerned by the memory usage
of storing the output of your command but want to send it by mail? Are
there exceptional constraints that we do not know about?

Regards,

-- 
  Nicolas George

Reply via email to