On Fri, Apr 4, 2025 at 5:02 PM Larry Martell <larry.mart...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2025 at 12:05 PM Fred <f...@blakemfg.com> wrote: >> >> HI, >> >> One reason to use the "solved" tag is to let everyone know that the OP >> has solved the problem and moved on so that others don't continue to >> waste their time and effort trying to find a solution when the OP has >> moved on and won't need to respond any more. >> >> Best regards, >> Fred > > > But you also top post, so you don’t really have any standing.
Sure he does.. he's standing on the thread :) > >> >> On 4/4/25 08:58, Andy Smith wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > On Fri, Apr 04, 2025 at 10:22:47AM +0700, Max Nikulin wrote: >> >> I am neutral to this recommendations. Just some considerations... >> >> >> >> I rarely use Gmail web UI, but this time I was curious enough to check its >> >> behavior. >> > >> > As I keep pointing out, and you have covered again here, any change of >> > subject is disastrous for the gmail web UI and the web UI of most of the >> > other large mailbox providers, which together count for the vast >> > majority of active email users even on extremely technical and ageing >> > population lists like this one. >> > >> > However some still seem to desire the idea of a "SOLVED" tag on the >> > basis that it provides some benefit for the web archives as provided by >> > Debian and most others. >> > >> > On the whole I don't much care either way. It feels a bit like >> > squabbling over the colour of the deck chairs on the RMS Titanic. I >> > personally am never going to change a subject line unless the topic of >> > the mail itself changes (and I remember). I just wish people arguing for >> > one thing or the other would admit the trade-offs. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Andy >> > >>
