On Fri, Apr 4, 2025 at 12:05 PM Fred <f...@blakemfg.com> wrote: > HI, > > One reason to use the "solved" tag is to let everyone know that the OP > has solved the problem and moved on so that others don't continue to > waste their time and effort trying to find a solution when the OP has > moved on and won't need to respond any more. > > Best regards, > Fred
But you also top post, so you don’t really have any standing. > On 4/4/25 08:58, Andy Smith wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Fri, Apr 04, 2025 at 10:22:47AM +0700, Max Nikulin wrote: > >> I am neutral to this recommendations. Just some considerations... > >> > >> I rarely use Gmail web UI, but this time I was curious enough to check > its > >> behavior. > > > > As I keep pointing out, and you have covered again here, any change of > > subject is disastrous for the gmail web UI and the web UI of most of the > > other large mailbox providers, which together count for the vast > > majority of active email users even on extremely technical and ageing > > population lists like this one. > > > > However some still seem to desire the idea of a "SOLVED" tag on the > > basis that it provides some benefit for the web archives as provided by > > Debian and most others. > > > > On the whole I don't much care either way. It feels a bit like > > squabbling over the colour of the deck chairs on the RMS Titanic. I > > personally am never going to change a subject line unless the topic of > > the mail itself changes (and I remember). I just wish people arguing for > > one thing or the other would admit the trade-offs. > > > > Thanks, > > Andy > > > >
