On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 02:16:23PM +0530, Sarbjit Singh Sandhu wrote:
> Dear Debian Developers,
> 

Hi,

There are developers here but this is mostly a list for Debian users.

> I am a 10th class student from India and want a feature request for the
> purpose of changing my school computers from windows to linux.
> 

Some feature request - it's a *lot* of work to create a Debian release.

Some educational institutitions are fixed on Windows. If yours is one
of them, you could point them to Linux successes in Kerala.

> I am writing to propose the creation of a new Debian branch that offers a
> stable release every year, as opposed to the current 5-year cycle. This
> would be particularly beneficial for educational institutions, where a
> balance between stability and up-to-date software is crucial.
> 

As it is, the creation of a major stable release takes a long time.
Once released, there's a two year cycle and an additional one year
of security support - this is typical for the last few releases.
(See, for example, https://endoflife.date/debian). 

> A yearly stable release would allow schools to benefit from the latest
> software and security updates without the long wait between releases. This
> would also make it easier for schools to plan their IT infrastructure and
> ensure that students have access to the latest tools and technologies.
> 

Security updates are supplied very regularly: the point releases also
roll them up every few months. The latest software takes time to package
- not all software changes every year, and there are > 40,000 packages.

> I believe this could be achieved by creating a new branch that is based on
> Debian Stable but receives more frequent updates, similar to how Ubuntu LTS
> works but with a shorter cycle.
> 
For comparison:

Ubuntu non-LTS releases every six months: some of that is a wrapper round
Debian packages with essentially no changes. Ubuntu also only support a
subset of that amount - much of the software in Ubuntu universe is only
supported on best endeavours. That effort takes Canonical a significant
amount of work.

I don't think this is feasible given volunteer effort and I am not 
convinced that it would solve any real existing problem other than
just for the sake of changing a release date more often.

> Thank you for considering this proposal. I look forward to your feedback
> and discussion on this matter.
> 

Thank you for your interest - sorry to pour cold water on your idea but
please keep on enjoying Linux and campaigning for its wider use.

> Best regards,
> Gurlagan Singh.

With every good wish, as ever,

Andrew Cater
(amaca...@einval.com)

Reply via email to