> > >> Who's doing it backwards depends, I guess, on your point of view.
> > > > > > I guess it's a religious war, but for once the superior options > > > seem technically obvious. > > > > My point was that neither is "backwards". Dates are no different > > than any other language element. Americans usually say, "January > > fourth, two thousand three" and so they write their dates that way. > > Brits tend to say"Fourth of January...". It's simply dialect > > stretching back centuries, and nothing to do with date sorting on > > computers. Let me add another element to this topic: In the English language, at least in its American version, the simple division operation 6/2 = 3 in its long form is written 3 ________ | 6 2 | ___ | which corresponds to 6 divided by 2 is 3, but is not exactly co-sequential with its written form. Hence the common confusion among the not so educated as to the written notation. I find the notation used in (the rest of the planet ?) other parts more corresponding to the human language: | 6 | 2 |_________ 3 By the way, did anybody read about the varying frecuency of dislexia, according to the spoken language? That was very interesting data. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]