On Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 06:11:31PM -0600, Kent West wrote:
> Colin Watson wrote:
> >"2004/01/04" is clear
> 
> Not to me; it could be April 1st, or January 4th.

Nobody actually uses YYYY/DD/MM to my knowledge (thank $DEITY), which is
one of the reasons that this is the ISO date format (possibly with "-"
substituted for "/").

-- 
Colin Watson                                  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to