On Mi, 23 iun 21, 17:12:07, Michael Grant wrote: > > Apparently the lines are blurry enough for you to include Signal in that > > list. > > Why? Not blurry at all. Signal is just as closed a system as > WhatsApp. Maybe more private, but unless you know something I don't, > Signal doesn't talk to anything other than other Signal. Puppeted > bridges are not interoperability, as far as I am aware, all users > still need to be on Signal.
You seem to be using a completely different meaning of 'proprietary' (no federation) than I do (closed source software, proprietary protocol that must be reversed engineered, patents, etc.). > You'll notice that I didn't put Matrix on that list. One day there > will be multiple Matrix servers and clients and it's not dependent on > any single company's infrastructure. One day? There are already 3 clients in Debian stable, and there's at least matrix.debian.social ;) (or did you mean server software?) Kind regards, Andrei -- http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
