Hi. On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 10:22:40AM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 10:33:58PM -0400, Kenneth Parker wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 12:52 PM Greg Wooledge <wool...@eeg.ccf.org> wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 06:48:22PM +0200, mjonsson1...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > <html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" > > > xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m=" > > > http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml"; xmlns=" > > > http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40";><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type > > > content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft > > > Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!-- > > > > > > Please post only text, not HTML. If your email agent *cannot* do plain > > > text alone, at least configure it to send both plain text and HTML. Or, > > > y'know, get a better email agent. > > > > > > > As a Gmail User, but with a corporate (Universe?) email address ( > > sea7k...@eyeblinkuniverse.com), running on a hosted Ubuntu 16.04.6 Server > > with Exim4 4.86.2 running its Mail. I administer it via ssh, and get email > > via alpine 2.20. I used to use that corporate email for my technical email > > lists, until Gmail started putting MY OWN email into my Spam Folder. I > > just tried it now. Google's Error message: "Why is this message in spam? > > It is in violation of Google's recommended sender guidelines", So now, > > Google is running the Internet? Those Universe emails were DEFINITELY text > > only! > > Most probably you'll have to implement SPF and/or DKIM [1, 2]
Both, and a DMARC too. Also, valid PTR records. While not required by any RFC, valid PTRs are considered mandatory by some big players like GMail. > As this was happening to me more and more (people "on" some variant of > googlemail, or hotmail/outlook/some other Microsoft mail thingy, etc. > not receiving my mails -- and digging further yes, receiving them in > their spam folders and thus not seeing them), I bit the bullet and > went for SPF/DKIM (I hadn't the guts for DMARC yet, I don't particularly > like that one). DKIM is very straightforward. There are some "gotchas" if you're sending mails to the maillists - some maillists just love to modify arbitrary e-mail headers, which leads to failed DKIM checks - but they can be solved. Reco
