On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 14:11:01 -0500 Fraser Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 15 November 2003 07:00, David Palmer. wrote: > > > I don't know why we have to go to Red Hat for something that Debian > > requires. > > My reason for being interested in anaconda-debian is kickstart, that's > the entire reason, the only reason. > > I agree that debian-installer is the way to go for a normal Debian > install and I have done several test installs with it over the past 6 > months. However, AFAIK debian-installer still doesn't support > unattended installs (or perhaps they just aren't documented?). > > I can understand progeny's reasons for doing the anaconda port > somewhat but I don't see why they wouldn't have been better served by > helped d-i and then getting it ported to work with redhat. All > questions aside, the anaconda port was apparently done and the work > does sound useful as a stop-gap measure. > Hello Fraser, A package directory search for kickstart is somewhat pointless at the moment, but I believe I have seen some reference to a Debian package of that name on this list at some stage. Regards, David. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
