On Saturday 15 November 2003 07:00, David Palmer. wrote: > I don't know why we have to go to Red Hat for something that Debian > requires.
My reason for being interested in anaconda-debian is kickstart, that's the entire reason, the only reason. I agree that debian-installer is the way to go for a normal Debian install and I have done several test installs with it over the past 6 months. However, AFAIK debian-installer still doesn't support unattended installs (or perhaps they just aren't documented?). I can understand progeny's reasons for doing the anaconda port somewhat but I don't see why they wouldn't have been better served by helped d-i and then getting it ported to work with redhat. All questions aside, the anaconda port was apparently done and the work does sound useful as a stop-gap measure. -- Fraser Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.wehave.net/ Halton Hills, Ontario, Canada Debian GNU/Linux -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
