On Fri 16 Dec 2016 at 22:40:01 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 09:31:06PM +0000, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > On Friday 16 December 2016 21:19:45 Joe wrote: > > > On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 20:55:32 +0000 > > > > > > Lisi Reisz <lisi.re...@gmail.com> wrote: > > [...] > > > You have over-cut. Here is what you cut, which is highly relevant: > > > > "On Friday 16 December 2016 09:58:36 to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > > > At least in the case of delivery to the SPAM box the mail has been > > > > actually delivered to the user. > > > > > > "Technically", yes. > > > > No, not just technically. Actually. The recipient then has the choice > > whether to ignore it or not." > > Let's just agree to differ on that.
No, let's just say your "technically" means exactly the same as Lisi's "actually". Then there is no need to differ and everybody is happy. :) -- Brian.
