-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 09:31:06PM +0000, Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Friday 16 December 2016 21:19:45 Joe wrote: > > On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 20:55:32 +0000 > > > > Lisi Reisz <lisi.re...@gmail.com> wrote:
[...] > You have over-cut. Here is what you cut, which is highly relevant: > > "On Friday 16 December 2016 09:58:36 to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > > At least in the case of delivery to the SPAM box the mail has been > > > actually delivered to the user. > > > > "Technically", yes. > > No, not just technically. Actually. The recipient then has the choice > whether to ignore it or not." Let's just agree to differ on that. regards - -- t -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlhUXzEACgkQBcgs9XrR2kYexACeKNH/Dm9fs2oQflhEXP6MY/jk pX8Ani5PJGcAI1nwtaZswrVJPY372xHD =XuwD -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
