2016-09-19 12:44 GMT+02:00 Brian <a...@cityscape.co.uk>: > On Sun 18 Sep 2016 at 22:39:32 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote: > >> On Sunday 18 September 2016 19:18:33 Brian wrote: >> > On Sun 18 Sep 2016 at 19:31:48 +0200, David Rotger wrote: >> > > I've sane installed and running. Sane-find-scanner and scanimage -L >> > > detect my scanner, >> > >> > That's good. Would you post the output of both these commands and also >> > say what scanner (or multi-functional device) you have. >> > >> > > and the test works fine. >> > >> > What test are you talking about? Please give any command you used. >> > >> > > But when I launch xsane they say >> > > that can't find any device. With simple-scan I have the same problem. >> > >> > Strange. xsane uses the same information you have from sane-find-scanner >> > and scanimage -L as far as I know. >> >> The permissions are often wrong. Make sure that your user is in the scanner >> group. > > On Jessie plus systemd a user in the scanner group gives nothing that is > not already available on an ACL. Please see > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2016/07/msg00528.html > > (A CC: to David Rotger because there is doubt whether his being > subscribed to -user or reading the list archives). > > -- > Brian.
The output of sane-find-scanner http://pastebin.com/ksghQg26 The output of scanimage -L http://pastebin.com/bcxt0Cqi when I do: service saned restart they out: Failed to restart saned.service: Unit saned.service is masked. and systemctl satatus saned.socket http://pastebin.com/xaajGXDf What I'm doing wrong!?!? -- David Rotger
