On 08/26/2016 06:19 AM, Nicolas George wrote:
Le decadi 10 fructidor, an CCXXIV, Pol Hallen a écrit :
I suggests him to separate each networks:
floor1 - 192.168.1.0/24
floor2 - 192.168.2.0/24
floor3 - 192.168.3.0/24
floor4 - 192.168.4.0/24
Why?
You give way too few information about the needs of your friend to allow
anyone to give relevant advice. If someone did, it was just by exercising
supernatural divination powers.
(Also, I wonder why people always fiddle with the cumbersome 192.168 instead
of going for simply 10.)
And the difference?? Both are designated for private use. 192.168
simply has less address space. 10. can certainly be used, as can
192.168, either in a number of configurations. Neither is really more
cumbersome than others. Its all in how you define your network space.
Regards,
--
73's
Mike, WB5VQX
